• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pneumatic Tips

Tips, Trends, Resources, News and Information

  • Pneumatics Blog
  • Industry News
  • Air Preparation
  • Engineering Basics
  • Equipment
    • Actuators
    • Cylinders
    • Fittings
    • Gears
    • Grippers
    • Pumps
    • Air Compressors
    • Tubing
    • Vacuums
    • Valves
  • Pressure Sensing
  • Design Guides
    • Design Guide Library
    • Hydraulic Valves
    • Electro-Pneumatic Regulators
    • Hydraulic Cylinders
    • Hydraulic Hose Assembly
    • Hydraulic Pumps
    • Pneumatic Actuators
  • Videos
You are here: Home / Air Preparation / Compressed air fail: Wet flow

Compressed air fail: Wet flow

September 1, 2021 By Paul Heney Leave a Comment

Share
Fig. 1. When measuring wet air flow, it is better to use a differential pressure based flow meter as shown on this photo. Thermal mass flow meters are sensitive to water drops: the drops cause spikes in the flow signal when hitting the sensor element.

A large mine had a compressed air assessment done to gauge the efficiency of its system. The complex had more 14 large air compressors feeding underground operations. The assessment results showed their many compressors were running at superior efficiency; in fact, the numbers were so good they could not possibly be true.

In previous years, another study was done — and a number of well-placed flow meters were installed to measure the system air flow, including the main output of each set of compressors. These meters were used in the calculation of the system specific power.

Specific poser is a number not unlike a gas mileage indicator. If the total power consumed by the system is divided by the number of hundred cubic feet measured by the flow meters, the result can be used to determine how efficiently any compressed air system is producing compressed air. A good reading for large compressors is under 18 kW per 100 cfm, while a bad reading would be anything higher than 20 kW per 100.

This particular mine had big problems with compressor cooling in the summertime. Most of the large screw compressors were air cooled units, and the few liquid-cooled compressors had been converted to glycol to air coolers. Many of the coolers had become fouled with road dust kicked up by large mine trucks that passed by the air compressors every day. Anytime the ambient temperatures got hotter than about 60° F, the output of the compressors reached about 80° F or hotter.

Further to this, the mine had no air dryers — the discharge of the air compressors was totally saturated with water, so large amounts of water condensed out in the piping system. And this caused trouble with the system flow meters, because the meter type installed was thermal mass style.

Thermal mass flow meters measure the flow of air though a cooling effect. A heated probe is inserted in the stream of compressed air, which cools the tip. The power required to keep tip at constant temperature is measured and is directly proportional to the flow of air past the measuring probes. This works very well if the compressed air is dry, however, with wet and saturated air the flow meter will read high or even off scale.

The selected flow meters were the wrong style to be used in this situation. The assessment that deemed the air compressors very efficient was relying on faulty data. When careful measurements were done by a seasoned auditor, the results were not good. The system was extremely inefficient, with some compressor consuming 80% power, yet only producing 20% flow. Of the 14 compressors, only two were producing full flow. The capacity output was so bad, the mine had resorted to renting a fleet of six diesel portable compressors just to keep up!

Measurement of compressed air power and flow is important, but careful attention needs to be given to the measurement methods. Faulty data leads to faulty conclusions as it did in this case. Correct measurement (and some timely training) would have told system operators their compressors were at low capacity and would have saved more than $1,000,000 per year in rental and fuel costs!

You may also like:


  • Compressed air fail: Verification spots trouble

  • Compressed air fail: Flow meter trouble

  • Compressed air fail: The spare dryer

  • Compressed air fail: Compressor response

Filed Under: Air Preparation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Fluid Power World Digital Edition

Fluid Power World Digital EditionBrowse the most current issue of Fluid Power World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading design engineering magazine today.

RSS Featured White Papers

  • eBook: Practical Guide to Pneumatics
  • Saving energy and service cost with electric linear systems
  • White Paper-How to Design Efficient Pneumatic Systems!
Subscribe Today
Hose Assembly Tips

Follow Paul on Twitter

Tweets by @DW_Editor

Follow Mary on Twitter

Tweets by @DW_MaryGannon

Footer

Pneumatic Tips

Fluid Power World Network

  • Fluid Power World
  • Hose Assembly Tips
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • Sealing and Contamination Tips
  • Fluid Power Distributor Lookup

PNEUMATIC TIPS

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us
Follow us on Twitter  Add us on Facebook  Follow us on LinkedIn  Follow us on YouTube  Follow us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy