• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Pneumatic Tips

Tips, Trends, Resources, News and Information

  • Blog
  • Industry News
  • Air Preparation
  • Engineering Basics
  • Components
    • Actuators
    • Cylinders
    • Fittings
    • Gears
    • Grippers
    • Pumps
    • Air Compressors
    • Tubing
    • Vacuums
    • Valves
  • Pressure Sensing
  • Design Guide Library
  • Classrooms
    • Pneumatics Classroom
You are here: Home / Blog / Compressed air fail: The mystery filter

Compressed air fail: The mystery filter

May 27, 2022 By Paul Heney

Share
Fig. 1. This forgotten and redundant coalescing filter has been in service for six years without change. Not surprisingly, its pressure differential is excessive — and costs $7,000 per year in extra electricity.

By Ron Marshall

A building products company had a compressed air system that featured one large 1,500-cfm compressor and three smaller ones. The compressed air flow had grown to a point where the large compressor could only be turned off during shutdown periods; when it was turned off, the plant pressure would collapse.

The large compressor was installed with its own air dryer and filters, with the other compressors having a set of parallel filters and dryers. A compressed air auditor noticed during a plant assessment that while the smaller compressors ran at normal pressure of around 95 psi, the large compressor ran at elevated pressure above 105 psi. Because the compressor was only rated at 100 psi at full load, this was a concern.

More investigation revealed that an extra filter had been installed at the discharge of the large air dryer. The inlet filter was a very efficient mist eliminator design (1/2-psi rated), and the dryer was properly sized for the flow (3-psi rated), yet the pressure loss across the dryer/filter combination was 13 psi. It should be noted the filter differential gauge was showing no pressure drop (it was later found to be defective).

For some reason, this extra coalescing filter had been installed and then simply forgotten about. It was arranged where there was no bypass to enable changing the element, so it had never been maintained in its six-year existence! Nobody knew the reason for its existence because the other compressors had no such filtering.

The auditor calculated that the excessive pressure loss across this filter was costing about $7,000 per year in extra electricity costs. And making matters worse, it was contributing to accelerating aging of the associated air compressor, due to the overheating.

 

 

 

You may also like:


  • Compressed air fail: Load sharing

  • Compressed air fail: Don’t forget the dryer!

  • Compressed air fail: Regulator size

  • Compressed air fail: Sizing bigger

Filed Under: Air Compressors, Air Preparation, Blog, Filters

Primary Sidebar

Fluid Power World Digital Edition

Fluid Power World Digital EditionBrowse the most current issue of Fluid Power World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading design engineering magazine today.

RSS Featured White Papers

  • eBook: Practical Guide to Pneumatics
  • Saving energy and service cost with electric linear systems
  • White Paper-How to Design Efficient Pneumatic Systems!

Fluid Power Design Guides

fluid
“pt
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Fluid Power Professionals.
Hose Assembly Tips

Footer

Pneumatic Tips

Fluid Power World Network

  • Fluid Power World
  • Hose Assembly Tips
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • Sealing and Contamination Tips
  • Fluid Power Distributor Lookup

PNEUMATIC TIPS

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy